Sorry if this is too rambly. I'm in a university Fiction workshop, and I have absolutely loathed my story from day one. My biggest problem is that it has no plot. I've always felt that if I'm not feeling something, I turn the page in my notebook open a new tab in Scrivener and start from square one. I usually do this several times when I'm starting a story (and in fact, the "first draft" that I submitted is technically a third draft). But for the purposes of this class, my story has to very clearly be a revised version of the first draft, and not an "entirely unrelated" story. Personally, I'm not sure how anyone can tell that, since little changes add up and the story is meant to evolve. For my second draft, I started from the beginning and wrote basically the same thing but with a change in tone and style. I was thinking for my third draft, I could start with putting my characters in a different situation and have something happen to them, but now I'm not sure if that will be "too different".
My professor's comments on my second draft say that I need to flesh it out, but I'm struggling with how to go about this (and it's not my prof's job to walk me through it), and honestly my workshop group is really unhelpful.
So, I'm turning to you guys (as well as e-mailing the prof). What is your revising process like? When a story just isn't working, is there any way to revive it without doing a complete re-write? Do you always have to start from scratch like I do, or is there a better process for going through piece by piece and transforming the story? Specifically, have you ever written something completely void of action and had to somehow inject the plot into what you already wrote? I often go back while I'm writing and tweak/add/move little details around, but I'm at a loss at how to do this with something that's been sitting for a while, without, y'know. Starting over.
My professor's comments on my second draft say that I need to flesh it out, but I'm struggling with how to go about this (and it's not my prof's job to walk me through it), and honestly my workshop group is really unhelpful.
So, I'm turning to you guys (as well as e-mailing the prof). What is your revising process like? When a story just isn't working, is there any way to revive it without doing a complete re-write? Do you always have to start from scratch like I do, or is there a better process for going through piece by piece and transforming the story? Specifically, have you ever written something completely void of action and had to somehow inject the plot into what you already wrote? I often go back while I'm writing and tweak/add/move little details around, but I'm at a loss at how to do this with something that's been sitting for a while, without, y'know. Starting over.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-05 07:47 pm (UTC)When I sit down to plan something out, I start with the character and what he wants. The "plot" is all the obstacles in his path to getting that, and how he overcomes them (or doesn't, depending on the story) in the end. A lot of people mistake "stuff happens" for "plot," but that's not technically how it works. "Plot" is the decisions and choices the character makes.
You said "have something happen to them," but the important part is what they do about that thing that happens.
I had this issue with one of my stories. It wasn't that it had no plot, it was that the plot was broken. Stuff happened to my character, but he didn't make anything happen--he was carried along by events and reacted the entire time rather than acting. And in order to fix that, I basically had to re-write the entire thing from about midway through to the end. It was much improved thereby.
If you're a discovery writer rather than an outliner, that may be part of your issue. I use the Seven Point Structure for outlining, and it's stood me in good stead, but it doesn't always save me.
I hope that helped.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-02-05 07:56 pm (UTC)*What do I like about the story and want to keep?
*What is the overarching conflict that takes me from beginning to end?
*If I somehow got to the writing stage and didn't have that, then this is when I figure that out based on the characters and the world
*How does the main character change over the course of the story?
I'm sure there are others but those are the main ones that I can think of off the top of my head.
After I answer these questions I look over the answers and really question how much I like what I came up with. If any of it sounds like I'll be bored writing it then I scrap it and come up with something else.
I don't know if you could do this and come up with something that's not completely different, but if you want to try to do that then you should try to find some things that you like about what you've written and emphasize those parts.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-02-05 08:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-06 01:18 am (UTC)The characters don't actually have to go anywhere or do anything other than talk to each other. I've been in workshops before where students were given a template and asked to fill it in. For example: two people enter a room, they sit on the couch, one of them cries and the other one leaves. That's what happens but it's not the story. If that makes sense.
Maybe you could think about revision at the dialogue level.