Adverbs: yes or no?

[serria]

I quietly read this article on the Huffington Post today, and naturally thought I'd quickly post it for you all.


In Defense Of Adverbs
By Maddie Crum

Like like and other filler words, certain adverbs have saturated our speech and our writing, making once-meaningful phrases seem totally vapid. The idea that adverbs are just extraneous fluff has led to a smear campaign against them, and it's become common to suggest axing the part of speech altogether in order to make writing more powerful. This forceful call for more forceful writing is misguided; adverbs can be phonetically pleasing, can imbue sentences with subtlety, and should not be entirely shunned.
( Click to read the rest of the article... )

Source

Adverbs have a bad reputation among the creative writing elite. They are accused, often with reason, of weakening sentences and cheapening the meaning. In my writing, I tend to use them too often - but I used them a lot more often before my first (and only) creative writing course, where I learned that they are Totally Evil. That's not a slight exaggeration, either. My professor docked points for adverb use, unless it was deemed necessary as a last resort sort of thing. To be honest, adverbs don't bother me unless the sentence actually is stronger without them - which, to be fair, it often is. But I do feel that sometimes adverbs do give the verb a meaning appropriate to the story that either can't be portrayed without it, and alternative verbs either don't exist or don't sound natural. What do you think? Do you care about adverbs either way?

Friday Rants and Raves - March 7

[sarillia]

It's that time again! Made any progress lately? Anything exciting happen? Got something to vent about? Let's hear it!

This week's picture is from an artist known as De Es Schwertberger. You can click on his name to visit his website and see more of his work if you're interested.

on writing female characters

[splinteredstar]

Okay, so. This is mostly me trying to sort my own brain out. Sometimes writing things down helps me figure out what they are.

Short version: sometimes I get wigged out over female characters.

Context: I have an old, old idea. Involves rebels against an oppressive government, only the leader of the rebellion falls under the influence of the superweapon (I can ramble about how that works later) and goes bug fuck insane. Still not certain if the crazy is terminal.

Originally, the rebel leader was a man named Joshua, but Joshua ended up being a very different character (a Royalist, for one). So I split him into two, Joshua and Julian, Julian being the rebel leader who eventually goes insane and becomes the villain. And it sat for a year.

Well this week I was struck with the idea. What if Julian was instead Jillian?

But that sort of opened a mess of questions in my head. A good rebel leader (and good villain) requires passion and drive and cunning and charisma. Would making the villain a woman ‘make a statement’ about women with those traits? I always despaired as a child that all the powerful women in fiction were evil. But if I /don’t/ make the character a woman, is that making a different, equally bad statement? Does equal representation count for the antagonists?

Worrying about all this is a bit daft, I know. A character shouldn’t be swayed by the pressures in my society. But I do worry. What if I’m being swayed and not aware of it? There's a mess of social implications with female characters which of course also exist for male characters, but I don't feel them as strongly. Thinking about it is better than, well, not thinking about it, but how do I find an /answer/?

Arg. Any opinions would be wonderful.

 

"What's the point of writing if no one reads it?"

[sarillia]

...and I will also be rambling about the idea that everyone should be constantly working to improve

I only started writing less than seven years ago. A few times before that, I had started to write something but it never got past two handwritten pages and I never made a serious attempt at it. Then when I was 16, for reasons I still don't understand, I signed up for National Novel Writing Month. I loved it and I've done it every year since and I've also participated in a lot of the unofficial spin-offs.

So maybe I have a different approach to writing than most people because it was nothing but entertainment from Day One. I had no grand plans to be published or ideas about making a career as a writer. I have always been a very anxious person so from the start I told myself that I would not be showing my writing to other people. It was just for fun. Just for me. And I kept that up for a long time.

But people could not let me do so in peace. So many people kept asking me that question that I typed up there in the post title. They kept telling me how sad it was that these stories would sit on my computer forever only to be read by me.

What makes writing different from other pastimes? Obviously one big thing is that it produces something, but why should that come with an obligation to share that product with the world.

Speaking of obligations, that's another thing that I always heard. "If you don't show anyone your writing then you are never going to improve." Fair enough. But who said I wanted to improve? Why should that be a given? Why couldn't it just be something I did for fun? I realize that "having fun" and "trying to improve" are not incompatible but that doesn't mean they can't be separated.

I've come across this idea a lot that if you write or do anything creative then you should be trying to become great at it. Even in fandom, which has lately been derided as a place where people want to hear nothing but positive comments (which is apparently just awful), there are people acting like writers are breaking some kind of code if they don't ask for constructive criticism.

Things have changed for me. I've decided that I would like to try out the whole sharing and getting criticism thing. But I don't think that's the only valid way to write. There are hobbyists who care about nothing but how much fun they're having--I used to be one of them and it brought me a lot of joy--and I don't see why they should be looked down on so much.

Maybe someone who disagrees with me can make a persuasive argument. I honestly don't understand this, and I have a feeling that my attitude is just as incomprehensible to some other people.